Perspectivas

The concept of “better regulation” has been widely promoted as a means to improve the efficiency, effectiveness, and transparency of regulatory frameworks. However, it often focuses on processes—streamlining procedures, reducing administrative burdens, and enhancing consultation—without fully addressing the fundamental question: better regulation for what purpose? This is where the concept of “regulation for better” becomes essential.

Regulatory quality must be measured not only by procedural efficiency but also by the tangible improvements it brings to outcomes such as public safety, environmental sustainability, economic fairness, and societal well-being. “Regulation for better” shifts the focus from mechanical compliance to the strategic role of regulation in shaping a fair, sustainable, and resilient system.

A framework concerned only with simplifying processes may reduce immediate costs but could fail to address systemic risks, market distortions, or long-term societal challenges. In contrast, a “regulation for better” approach considers how rules can foster innovation, ensure quality, safeguard integrity, and align with broader policy objectives.

The real challenge is balancing efficiency with purpose—designing regulations that are both streamlined and impactful. Achieving this balance requires evidence-based policymaking, stakeholder engagement, and continuous performance evaluation. It also demands a forward-looking approach that anticipates emerging trends, risks, and opportunities in areas such as technology, environmental change, and global trade.

Ultimately, “better regulation” and “regulation for better” are not competing ideas but complementary principles. Efficient processes should be in service of meaningful results, ensuring that regulation actively contributes to building resilient, fair, and prosperous societies.